Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 401 | Search articles
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | SubscribeLogin 
     


 
 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 39-40

Lecturers' vocal fatigue and online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic


Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus

Date of Submission24-Mar-2021
Date of Acceptance09-Jul-2021
Date of Web Publication12-Apr-2022

Correspondence Address:
Elena Kkese
Tasou Isaak 3, Alethriko, Larnaca 7570
Cyprus
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jlv.jlv_1_21

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kkese E. Lecturers' vocal fatigue and online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Laryngol Voice 2021;11:39-40

How to cite this URL:
Kkese E. Lecturers' vocal fatigue and online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Laryngol Voice [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Dec 5];11:39-40. Available from: https://www.laryngologyandvoice.org/text.asp?2021/11/2/39/342859



Sir,

Lecturers' voice problems have been investigated in previous studies with research suggesting that most of them experience short- or long-term voice problems during some time in their lifetime.[1] Excessive tissue vibration or repeated vocal fold posturing can result in overused or under-recovered voice that gives rise to vocal fatigue.[2],[3] Symptoms may include lecturers losing part of their pitch range; also, loss of voice, hoarseness, a tired or scratchy throat, soreness, and muscle pain in the neck or larynx. This condition occurs when lecturers use their voice to teach, discipline, or manage students for long hours without a break.

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced universities to adapt quickly to online education. Lecturers are asked to adjust to the new learning environment, which may in fact be a source of anxiety for them. Anxiety may be characterized by a need to be louder, a need to fill silences (resulting in talking more than required), and/or a need to speak at a faster pace. Vocal fatigue may, as a result, stem from lecturers' anxiety. However, anxiety could be controlled to some extent when lecturers adapt a more kinesthetic approach; this suggests that they should not merely face the camera but use the entire space the camera picks up. Besides anxiety, lecturers may talk louder when they feel that the students cannot hear or understand them. This indicates that instead of focusing on clarity of speech, they emphasize on loudness. A further factor may involve microphones; when both lecturer and students have their microphones unmuted, a noisy background is created, where the lecturer feels s/he needs to cut in vocally. In these cases, using more visual cues and gestures such as the 'raise hand' feature may be more useful.

We suggest that vocal fatigue could be prevented by improving the clarity of the delivery; this could also improve students' understanding. Clarity of delivery could include an emphasis on the choice and use of words and phrases in speech as well as on consonants, frequent pauses, and slower pace. Our final claim is that lecturers should make sure that breathing supports voice as in intercostal diaphragmatic breathing (or deep breathing). In this case, breathing uses the diaphragm, which is a muscle under the lungs, to pull air into the lungs. This type of breathing helps voice quality and releases tension. Shallow breathing, on the other hand, is breathing with the chest using muscles to expand the lungs and involves taking in less air while the voice is more constricted. In this case, breathing affects tone and voice resonance and interferes with students' learning process.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Banks RE, Bottalico P, Hunter EJ. The effect of classroom capacity on vocal fatigue as quantified by the vocal fatigue index. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2017;69:85-93.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hunter EJ. General statistics of the NCVS self-administered vocal rating (SAVRa). The National Center for Voice and Speech Online Technical Memo 2008;11:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Welham NV, Maclagan MA. Vocal fatigue: Current knowledge and future directions. J Voice 2003;17:21-30.  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed568    
    Printed38    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal