Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 695 | Search articles
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | SubscribeLogin 

Table of Contents
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 40-42

Fatal airway complication during root canal treatment

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha “O” Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Date of Web Publication24-Jul-2019

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Santosh Kumar Swain
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Kalinganagar, Bhubaneswar - 751 003, Odisha
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jlv.JLV_16_18

Rights and Permissions

Foreign body (FB) in the tracheobronchial tree is not uncommon, especially in infants and children. They often present with respiratory obstruction, which can lead to death if not removed in time. Despite public awareness and education, FB aspiration continues to be a problem among patients. We report a case of tracheobronchial FB in a 13-year-old boy who had accidentally aspirated a sharp metallic needle, used during root canal treatment by a dental surgeon. The FB was removed successfully without any complication. FB inhalation is possible while conducting a surgical procedure in the oral cavity. This situation is a life-threatening condition, affecting the patient, and may also create a legal issue to the concerned caregivers. Every clinician should be aware of this type of mishappening during oral cavity procedure.

Keywords: Airway, foreign body, rigid bronchoscopy, root canal treatment

How to cite this article:
Swain SK, Sahu MC. Fatal airway complication during root canal treatment. J Laryngol Voice 2018;8:40-2

How to cite this URL:
Swain SK, Sahu MC. Fatal airway complication during root canal treatment. J Laryngol Voice [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Aug 16];8:40-2. Available from: https://www.laryngologyandvoice.org/text.asp?2018/8/2/40/263373

   Introduction Top

Accidental inhalation of foreign body (FB) in the airway is a common emergency in the otolaryngology practice. Accidental inhalation of FBs to the airway continues to be a cause of morbidity and mortality and needs prompt identification and early treatment of the potentially serious and sometimes fatal outcome. Although inhaled FBs are common in infant and children, they can occur at any age. Patients who undergo oral cavity or oropharyngeal procedures, have oral appliances or poor dentition, become intoxicated, receive sedatives, have neurological or psychiatric diseases, or are mentally challenged are at high risk of inhalation of FB into the airway.[1] In airway FB, the most common symptoms and findings are cough, dyspnea, decreased breath sounds, radiopaque FB, air trapping, and atelectasis.[2] Delayed diagnosis of FB may mimic conditions, such as asthma, croup, pneumonia, and gastroesophageal reflux.[3] There are various types of FBs that have been reported in the air passage – organic and inorganic, metallic and nonmetallic. A sharp needle-like material used during root canal treatment (RCT) accidentally entering the airway is an extremely rare FB of the tracheobronchial tree. Here, we report a tracheobronchial FB in a 13-year-old boy who had accidentally aspirated a sharp metallic needle, during RCT. The aim of this report is to present an unusual FB in tracheobronchial tree to create awareness among caregivers performing procedures in the oral cavity or oropharynx in awake state.

   Case Report Top

A 13-year-old boy was referred by a dentist to the outpatient department of otorhinolaryngology for sudden onset of cough and dyspnea with complaints of aspiration of FB. There was a history of accidental inhalation of a sharp needle of 2 cm length (ProTaper SX hand file used for orifice opening) during RCT. On clinical examination, the patient had mild breathlessness and coughing. On auscultation, there was minimally reduced air entry into the left lungs. On examination, nose, ear, oral cavity, oropharynx, and neck were within normal limit. X-ray of the neck and chest done outside showed a radiopaque sharp FB at the left bronchus near the carina [Figure 1]. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the neck and chest confirmed the position of the needle [Figure 2]. Since the patient had mild dyspnea, bronchodilators were administered and he was taken to the operation theater for rigid bronchoscopy under general anesthesia.
Figure 1: Chest X-ray posterior-anterior view showing a sharp radiopaque foreign body in the left bronchus

Click here to view
Figure 2: Computed tomographic scan of the chest showing sharp foreign body in the lower part of trachea

Click here to view

The patient was already in empty stomach for 4 h before the rigid bronchoscopy. Premedication of injection glycopyrrolate 10 mg/kg intravenous (IV), injection midazolam 0.04 mg/kg IV, and injection fentanyl 1 mg/kg IV and preoxygenation for 3 min were given. Dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg) was also given. The patient was immobilized with the use of hypnotic dose of propofol (2 mg/kg) with maintaining infusion of 100–300 mg/kg for titrating the depth anesthesia. The usual laryngoscopy was done, and 1% lidocaine was sprayed larynx and trachea. Then, it was then changed to rigid bronchoscopy. The FB [Figure 3] was successfully removed by rigid ventilating bronchoscope and optical forceps from the left bronchus without any complications. The patient was given antibiotics and nebulization with bronchodilators. The boy was discharged after 48 h.
Figure 3: Picture of the sharp foreign body after removal

Click here to view

   Discussion Top

Chevalier Jackson stated that the sole cause of inhalation of sharp FB in the tracheobronchial tree is carelessness on part of the persons in putting pins in the mouth or children imitating the bad example of their elders.[4] This is still true nowadays. Undiagnosed airway FBs may result in asphyxia, pneumonia, bronchiectasis, atelectasis, and even death. The severity of airway FB depends on the age of the patient, site of lodgment, size, composition of the FB, and duration, for which it has been lodged. Most of the FB inhalation occurs in children between 1 and 3 years of age. This is because (1) they do not have molars, necessary for grinding of food, (2) they have less controlled and coordinated swallowing and immaturity in laryngeal elevation and glottis closure, (3) there have tendency to explore the environment by placing the objects in mouth, and (4) they often run and play at the time of ingestion.[5] There are variety of FBs reported in the laryngotracheal airway. Food or food products are majority among all FBs, and reported incidence is as high as 70% of all FBs.[6] Unusual types of FB, such as broken tracheostomy tube, leech, broomstick, and bubble gums, have also been reported. A sharp needle inhaled into the airway during RCT is extremely rare and creates a dangerous situation. A child with a history of sudden-onset cough and wheeze, especially in the absence of any known pulmonary diseases such as bronchial asthma or chronic pulmonary infection, should be suspected of having an airway FB.[7] The important issue in airway FB is accurate diagnosis and speedy removal. History-taking and clinical examination can provide diagnostic clues, but a doubtful history of FB inhalation may delay the diagnosis.[8] Sometimes, FB inhalation may escape the diagnosis, particularly if there is no recollection of the episode. Hence, it is necessary to screen and X-ray every patient who is coming to the outpatient department with a history of swallowed FB presenting with sudden cough or dyspnea.[9] In case of inhaled FB in the airway, X-ray chest shows significant findings such as atelectasis or air trapping. Even though chest X-ray is generally the first imaging modality used for the diagnosis, it may yield negative results up to 30% of children who aspirate FBs as most are nonradiopaque.[7] Since, in our case, the patient had come immediately after aspiration of the FB, no significant changes in chest X-ray were seen except FB in the left bronchus near the carina. Negative imaging studies, however, do not exclude the presence of FB in the airway. Definitive diagnosis is often made by rigid bronchoscopy, but this is an invasive procedure, which needs anesthesia.[10] Alternate to bronchoscopic evaluation, the patient with suspected airway FB is evaluated with CT scan. CT scan is strengthened by the use of multislice CT scan with realistic three-dimensional reconstruction and virtual bronchoscopy.[11] If a FB is inhaled into the laryngotracheal airways, it can be removed with the help of rigid or flexible bronchoscope. Rigid bronchoscopy is an important technique, permitting removal of the tracheobronchial FBs.[12] Early identification and removal of FB are always better for the successful outcome. After FB lodgment, there are pathological changes like local inflammation, edema, and granulation tissue formation occur which may lead to further airway obstruction and making difficulty in bronchoscopic identification and removal of of foreign body.[13] During RCT, optimum alertness should be kept in mind so that it will prevent this type of life-threatening situation. Prevention is the most important element in reducing morbidity. As prevention is the key behind FB inhalation, more efforts should be given to educate caregivers and patients. Small spherical-shaped food items such as seeds and nuts may cause airway obstruction and asphyxia. In pediatric group, all these types of food should be avoided until the child is able to chew them adequately while sitting.

   Conclusion Top

FB aspiration is a preventable mishap. A high index of suspicion, careful history-taking, meticulous clinical examination, and neck and chest radiograph are essential for early diagnosis of airway FB. Aspiration of a sharp needle during RCT is a rare but potentially lethal condition. Care and alertness during dental procedure help to prevent slippage of the FB into the airway.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Debeljak A, Sorli J, Music E, Kecelj P. Bronchoscopic removal of foreign bodies in adults: Experience with 62 patients from 1974-1998. Eur Respir J 1999;14:792-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
Soysal O, Kuzucu A, Ulutas H. Tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration: A continuing challenge. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:223-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
Banjar AA, Al-Schamani MR, Al-Harbi Long J. standing tracheal foreign body in children: A case report. Egypt J Ear Nose Throat Allied Sci 2014;15:57-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
Ludemann JP, Riding KH. Choking on pins, needles and a blowdart: Aspiration of sharp, metallic foreign bodies secondary to careless behavior in seven adolescents. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:307-10.  Back to cited text no. 4
Saquib Mallick M, Rauf Khan A, Al-Bassam A. Late presentation of tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration in children. J Trop Pediatr 2005;51:145-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
Singh H, Parakh A. Tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration in children. Clin Pediatr 2014;53:415-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
Metrangelo S, Monetti C, Meneghini L, Zadra N, Giusti F. Eight years' experience with foreign-body aspiration in children: What is really important for a timely diagnosis? J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:1229-31.  Back to cited text no. 7
Skoulakis CE, Doxas PG, Papadakis CE, Proimos E, Christodoulou P, Bizakis JG, et al. Bronchoscopy for foreign body removal in children. A review and analysis of 210 cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2000;53:143-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
Swain SK, Mishra S, Dash M. An unusual asymptomatic foreign body at tracheobronchial tree. Int J Phonosurg Laryngol 2014;4:40-2.  Back to cited text no. 9
Zerella JT, Dimler M, McGill LC, Pippus KJ. Foreign body aspiration in children: Value of radiography and complications of bronchoscopy. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1651-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
Adaletli I, Kurugoglu S, Ulus S, Ozer H, Elicevik M, Kantarci F, et al. Utilization of low-dose multidetector CT and virtual bronchoscopy in children with suspected foreign body aspiration. Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:33-40.  Back to cited text no. 11
Divisi D, Di Tommaso S, Garramone M, Di Francescantonio W, Crisci RM, Costa AM, et al. Foreign bodies aspirated in children: Role of bronchoscopy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;55:249-52.  Back to cited text no. 12
Philippakis GE, Moustardas MP. Left main bronchus foreign body masquerading as diaphragmatic hernia in an adult patient. Int J Surg Case Rep 2012;3:170-2.  Back to cited text no. 13


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
   Case Report
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal